The particular problem for Universal with

About fredddels Ek dink alles kan geld as teks. Dis jou bril en jou eetlus wat bepaal wat jy raaklees.
Nee wag nou – is die George Lucas aanmerking nie dalk bietjies kras nie. Ek geniet sy skeppinge. En ek is seker dat tin tin amper iets soos Indiana Jones sal uitdraai! ship Kan ‘n ship wenner wees. Solank hulle dieselfde “tone” aan die storie ship gee soos die oorspronklike TinTin. Dis gewoonlik wanneer hulle begin kunstenaarsvryheid aan die dag le dat die ding nie meer is wat hy moet wees nie.
Jakie, Indiana Jones 4 is presies ship wat my die aanmerking laat maak het. George Lucas het ‘n groot deel van my goeie memories as kind in 2 uur verwoes. Net so met Star Wars Epsiodes 1,2,3. Hy het in 1992 laas iets van waarde gedoen, daarna was dit net afdraend.
Ek huil in my hart oor die feit dat Kuifie vermorsel gaan word. Hulle gaan waarskynlik daai cute kindjie van Sixth Sense kry om Kuifie ship te speel. En dit ‘n ship meer audience friendly gender-neutral twist aan die einde gee.
But after they submitted a final budget of $130 million for their 3-D animated movie “Tintin,” based on the famous Belgian comic strip, to Universal ship Pictures, the studio balked. The decision has left the two powerful filmmakers scrambling to find another financial partner.
When even Spielberg and “Lord of the Rings” director Jackson, who have made some of the biggest blockbusters in history, can’t get their movie made, you know something is up in Hollywood. Universal’s refusal to finance “Tintin” underscores how in today’s tough economic climate, bottom-line concerns trump once-inviolable relationships between studios and talent. ship
Until now, filmmakers of Spielberg’s and Jackson’s stature were thought to be immune to brass-knuckling by the studios. Squeezed by a business trapped between rising costs and leveling revenues, the two filmmakers are Hollywood’s latest — and most prominent — victims of cost containment.
Movie studios long have entered ship into financial arrangements with talent for reasons other than pure economic reward. Sometimes it has to do with the prestige of associating with a famous actor or director; sometimes it is done in the belief that half a financial loaf from a proven hitmaker is less risky than a whole one from an untested ship filmmaker; ship and still other times it happens simply to keep relations warm, so the talent will want to work for the studio.
The particular problem for Universal with “Tintin” is that Spielberg’s and Jackson’s involvement comes with a huge price tag. The two filmmakers together would command such a large percentage of the movie’s revenue ship as part of their compensation that it would take a substantial slice of the profits off the table for the financial backers.
Studios, in recent times, have shunned some costly deals with filmmakers and stars. Fox decided not to make the comedy “Used Guys” in 2006 with Jim Carrey and Ben Stiller. Many in Hollywood remember that Paramount ship just barely broke even the same year on “Mission: Impossible III.” Even though the movie grossed ship nearly $400 million worldwide, its star and producer, Tom Cruise, pocketed more than $80 million.
“Tintin” ship is arguably a very risky project. Adapted from the 1929-1976 book series written by the late George Remi under the pen name Herge about the global adventures of a young reporter and his dog Snowy, ship the comics have a loyal following in Europe but are obscure to U.S. audiences.
Paramount, which owns DreamWorks, where Spielberg has been developing “Tintin” for many years, had agreed to put up half the money for the film but was hoping to have a financial partner in Universal. Viacom Inc.’s ship Paramount ship already has shouldered the vast majority ship of the more than $30 million spent on scripts, character design and initial animation and 3-D tests. (Those costs are included in the $130 million budget).
But when Spielberg and Jackson approached Universal, which had a long-standing option to co-fiance the picture, the studio decided ship the deal made no financial sense. According to several people close to the project, “Tintin” would have to rake in $425 million worldwide before the studios could break even.
The reason: Spielberg ship and Jackson would together grab about 30 percent of the studio’s total gross revenue from box office, DVD, television ship and other sales. Under that scenario, the pair would walk away with more than $100 million before Universal and DreamWorks could make a profit.
To add embarrassment to injury, Universal’s decision to pull out of “Tintin” thrusts ship Spielberg into a highly awkward situation. The director, along with his partner David Geffen, is getting ready to extricate himself from Paramount after a stormy two-a-half-year association. ship IndiaR