Tuesday, February 17, 2015

The disputed maritime border region covering an area of 38,000 square kilometers of ocean in a ran

International Court draws new maritime border between Peru and Chile, giving favorable decision to the Peruvian | Ricardo Setti - VEJA.com
SEE Search News Sign Brazil SEE Science Economics Education Entertainment Sport World Health Digital Life Infographics The SEE Lists See SP Themes Subscribe SEE Elections 2014 Formula 1 Enem and Vestibular Guide SEE Project heartland express Syndicate See All Videos Subscribe SP SEE Videos Photo Gallery Infographics See SP Photos Sign SEE Videos Infographics Photo Gallery See SP Columnists Subscribe SEE Reinaldo Azevedo Lauro Jardim Nunes Ricardo Augusto Setti Fernanda heartland express Furquim All columnists See SP
This space aims to present good stories and independent opinion. It will not be neutral on the misfortunes heartland express of Brazil and pains of the world but reject any compromise with the bitterness and bad temper.
In front of the government palace in Lima, demonstrators celebrate the International Court of Justice favoring Peru disputed maritime boundaries heartland express with Chile (Photo: Enrique Castro Mendivil-/ Reuters)
A dispute that had dragged on for decades was decided on Monday by the International Court of Justice, which drew a new maritime heartland express border between Peru and Chile. The Hague tribunal, which is subordinate to the UN, granted to Peru the disputed part of the Pacific Ocean region, but left with Chile's heartland express rich fishing area off the coast.
The disputed maritime border region covering an area of 38,000 square kilometers of ocean in a range that extends to the limit of the continental shelf of each country. The annual fishing in this area is estimated at 200 million dollars for the Peruvian fishing industry.
Most of this fish is a species of anchovy used in the manufacture of fishmeal used as fertilizer and as animal feed. Peru and Chile, in that order, are the largest heartland express exporters of fishmeal.
Beyond economics, what was at stake for many was the national pride, based on the Chilean-Peruvian rivalry dating heartland express back to the War of the Pacific heartland express (1879-1883), lost by Lima and its ally Bolivia.
According to the Spanish newspaper El País, the decision announced on Monday will be followed by a complicated period of change heartland express nautical maps and legislative changes, heartland express which should reaffirm the work of the Pacific Alliance, an agreement that unites Peru, Chile, Colombia and Mexico for the development of countries.
For the director of the Peruvian Fisheries Society, however, the court fight will have no impact on the relationship heartland express between the two countries. "The decision will be mere joke in the history of relations between Peru and Chile," said Humberto Speziani Bloomberg. "There has been much Peruvian investment in Chile and vice versa. The maritime heartland express dispute is only one obstacle in the way of real integration. "
Bilateral trade between the two countries has tripled since 2004 to about $ 3.1 billion, the agency said, citing a free-trade agreement signed in 2006 as a great supporter of this increase. heartland express
The agreement became effective in March 2009 and two years later, the government of the two countries joined Colombia and Mexico to reduce barriers to trade and investment. In addition, more than 180,000 Peruvians live in Chile and Peru is the main tourist destination of the Chileans.
An article published by the Financial Times points out that, "although heartland express smug smiles and gnashing of teeth in some corners of the two countries", which seems a case of sovereignty that divides Lima and Santiago actually should strengthen the commitment of both sides " continue to be good neighbors. " heartland express "In fact, the decision does little more than reinforce the position that the two governments have adopted some time: we shake hands and move on," says the text.
Chilean President Sebastián Piñera, who is serving the last days of his term, said that Chile "varies profoundly" but "comply with and require compliance" Hague decision. "Given the nature and content of the decision, its implementation should be gradual and require from all parts agreements. We will take all necessary actions and measures to safeguard and protect the legitimate rights of our country, "he said, according to statements released by the press of the country.
Piñera also noted as positive the fact that Chile did not suffer significant economic losses. "Chile retains almost all of its fishing rights and the rights of our artisanal fishermen."
The decision comes in the transition period between the government of Piñera and Michelle Bachelet, who will assume the presidency in March. She said the decision, which he considered "a painful loss" for Chile, but pointed out that it is time for "unity and serenity."
The dispute came to court in 2008, when Peru presented the case, arguing that the division maritime territory in the treaties of 1952 and 1954 was not

No comments:

Post a Comment